Minneapolis went subzero, and the crowd went the other direction.
Thousands packed downtown streets for an “ICE Out” rally that organizers framed as a response to a stepped-up immigration enforcement presence in the Twin Cities. The turnout mattered because it was not just a weekend march. It was tied to a broader walkout and general strike effort backed by labor leaders and faith groups, according to PBS NewsHour.
And hovering over the protest was one specific, emotionally freighted detail that can reshape a local dispute into a national one. PBS reported that Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, was shot by an ICE officer in Minneapolis two weeks earlier. In the report, her image is described as spreading across the Twin Cities, turning her into a symbol for many demonstrators.
A cold-weather crowd, and a hotter message
Chants can be a kind of headline, and the one PBS captured was blunt: “ICE out! ICE out! ICE out!”
In its segment, PBS NewsHour described a downtown Minneapolis rally where thousands showed up despite “bone-chilling temperatures,” protesting what participants called a “siege of the Twin Cities.”
That framing is the political tell. Protesters are not just disputing policy. They are disputing presence, volume, and tactics, and they are trying to define the situation as extraordinary rather than routine enforcement.
The flashpoint name: Renee Nicole Good
Movements rally around moments, and sometimes around a face. PBS reported that Renee Nicole Good became an “icon” for many in Minneapolis and the surrounding area after she was shot by an ICE officer. The report described her image appearing widely throughout the Twin Cities, signaling that the incident has moved from private tragedy into public organizing fuel.
What is verifiable from the PBS report is the role the incident plays in the protest narrative: demonstrators point to it as proof of escalation, and it is being used as a visual shorthand for the wider enforcement surge they oppose.
What remains crucial, and what readers should watch for, are the accountability mechanics that follow any use-of-force allegation involving federal law enforcement. The questions are practical, not rhetorical: What review process is underway, what agency is leading it, and what findings will be made public.
ICE, the Twin Cities, and why the federal-local clash is predictable
Immigration enforcement is designed to be federal, but it plays out locally. ICE is a component of the Department of Homeland Security, tasked with enforcing federal laws related to border control, customs, trade, and immigration. DHS describes ICE as responsible for identifying and removing individuals who are in the country unlawfully, and for investigating transnational crime, among other duties. That basic structure is laid out in ICE background materials such as ICE’s “About ICE” page.
In practice, that federal mandate collides with city politics, workplace dynamics, and community networks. When a crackdown or surge is perceived, the reaction often shows up first in places with strong union presence, strong faith-based organizing, and dense immigrant communities, because those institutions provide the logistical muscle for mass turnout.
PBS described the Minneapolis protest as tied to a general strike and walkout supported by labor and faith leaders. That coalition matters, because it signals the protest is not limited to immigration advocacy circles. It is also a workplace and moral authority story, a combination that can pull in people who might not otherwise join an immigration-focused rally.
The quieter scene: a St. Paul cafe as a pressure gauge
Not everyone shows up with a sign. Some people show up by staying open, keeping the lights on, and watching the street through the window.
PBS included a snapshot from St. Paul, describing a downtown cafe, the Lost Fox, as “a quiet refuge” amid tension. Co-owner Annie Rose appears in the report as a kind of ambient narrator for a city trying to function normally while political conflict runs hot outside.
Those quieter moments often reveal what protests can mask. A rally can look unified from above, but street-level businesses and workers can feel squeezed from multiple sides: customers staying away, disrupted commutes, fear of enforcement activity, and heightened anxiety in neighborhoods where people are trying to keep their heads down.
What both sides are really battling over: legitimacy
Public fights over immigration enforcement often become fights over legitimacy, who gets to define what is “normal” and what is “overreach.”
On one side are demonstrators and organizers arguing that the enforcement posture in the Twin Cities has crossed into intimidation or a “siege,” as PBS reported protesters describing it. They are amplifying a specific alleged use-of-force incident, the shooting of Renee Nicole Good, as a piece of evidence that the stakes are not abstract.
Renee Nicole Good’s killing is the latest tragedy in ICE’s history of violence, and a moment that may be destabilizing for the Trump administration. https://t.co/nvGWKM43r6 pic.twitter.com/gC0XOlZDqg
— Vera Institute of Justice (@verainstitute) January 23, 2026
On the other side is the underlying federal position: that ICE has a lawful mandate, that enforcement is part of the job, and that operational decisions are driven by legal authority and mission priorities. The public-facing baseline of that mission is stated plainly in ICE materials like ICE’s agency overview.
UNBELIEVABLE – Ilhan Omar is FURIOUS that the rioters who stormed a church service were arrested but not the officer Renee Good tried to run over:
“An ICE agent shoots and kills Renee Nicole Good. No charges. No accountability.
But Black elected civil rights leaders like Nekima… pic.twitter.com/IrM4T6Jggt
— David J Harris Jr (@DavidJHarrisJr) January 23, 2026
Those two narratives do not meet neatly. They collide. The outcome can hinge less on slogans and more on documentation, body-camera policies, investigative findings, and any court filings or public reports that emerge later.
What happens next, and what to watch
The Minneapolis rally was a temperature test, and the crowd size suggests the issue has momentum. The next phase is usually less dramatic but more consequential.
Here is what is likely to matter most in the coming weeks and months:
First, clarity on the Renee Nicole Good shooting that PBS reported. If there are public statements, investigative updates, or legal actions, they will shape whether the incident remains a rallying symbol or becomes a documented case with defined findings.
Second, whether labor and faith leaders keep the coalition active beyond a single strike day. Sustained organizing changes the political math for local and state officials, who often end up pressed to take a position even when immigration enforcement is federally controlled.
Third, any changes in ICE operational posture that can be observed and verified, including the presence of officers, reports of enforcement actions, or official DHS communications. The debate will not be settled by volume alone. It will be settled by measurable actions, and by whatever receipts become public.
The last word is still a chant, for now
PBS captured the kind of repeated chorus that turns a crowd into a single instrument: “ICE out! ICE out! ICE out!”
But chants do not close cases. Documents do. If this story keeps building, the next turning point will not be another rally in the cold. It will be whatever paper trail, findings, and official answers follow the incident that made Renee Nicole Good a name on posters across the Twin Cities, as PBS reported.
References
